DMX and Fried Chicken.
I thought this line was pretty funny. It's taken from a Fox News article about a DMX movie premiere.
"...The film's director, Ernest Dickerson, told me at the party afterward (which, since it was a movie featuring black actors, featured fried chicken and mac and cheese as the cuisine)..."
Now, is that an odd line to be in a major press article or what?
"...The film's director, Ernest Dickerson, told me at the party afterward (which, since it was a movie featuring black actors, featured fried chicken and mac and cheese as the cuisine)..."
Now, is that an odd line to be in a major press article or what?
Dr. Dean or General Clark.
First, this article, here. It's about Sen. Zell Miller, a Democrat... This is one thing I don't like about Politics. Now, this guy supports Bush and he says why he supports him, he says he doesn't like Kerry because "John Kerry's spending and tax plan would stifle our economy and stall our recovery at the worst possible time," blah blah blah and yada yada yada.
So what does the Kerry administration do? They send out a list of Sen. Miller's quotes from the past that have supported/complimented Kerry. Now, pardon me, but people and the policies they back chance, especially in Politics. So really, you can't bring past compliments into the present picture, it just doesn't work. Am I the only one who sees this?
Next... Richard Clarke... This guy is a moron. Right now he's saying that Bush was not concerned about Al-Qaida when he took office. He's saying that Bush was obsessed with Saddam and wasn't paying attention to Clarke's warning that something needed to be done or there could be a serious terrorist threat to the US. Of course, back when Bush was supposed to be doing all of this, Clarke was writing emails and Memo's expressing his satisfaction and approval of the "increased pressure" Bush had put on Al-Qaeda.
Err, hold up, contradiction? Yeah, that's for sure... Sounds like someone wants to sell more copies of his books that's due out for sale... Nah, someone doing something to ensure that more copies of their books sell!? You're kidding me, in DC!?!? No way! Heh, sickening... Anyway, on to the subject line!
Ok, now i'm not sure which one of them it was because I only saw it for half of a second and he had his head down, but i'm pretty sure it was Dr. Dean, in fact i'm almost positive of it. However, it may have been General Clark. Anyway... Today I saw on Fox about how ... Shit, I don't want to talk about this. On to my next rambling.
Linux... Linux is cool, it's open source, yeah yeah, I like it, it's neat. I also like Windows. As much shit as Windows catches is no more then any other major program would catch if it was as scrutinized. Here's a hint: If you don't properly protect your computer, hackers can get into it, it doesn't matter if it's running Windows or Linux or OSX or anything... If you don't take the proper precautions, they'll get into it. Anyhow, that's not even my point! Man, I must be boring you, heh. On to my point...
There was this guy on Fox, I don't know his name and I don't care, he was some old Linux Redhat guy. He was talking about how he wanted the playing field to be fair for all the other corporations against Microsoft. Well, i'm sorry, but that's bullshit. If you want to beat someone in business, you don't cry. You don't cry like a little baby and say that "you just want it to be fair." Well here's some news for you, LIFE IS NOT FAIR, FUCKWADS. Stop crying.
I'm sick of this in general, but in business too. If you want to out sell, then learn how to market a good product. They're whining, blah blah blah. "Microsoft owns/owned 96% of the market..." Yeah, and they worked to get there, they didn't just "get it" because the playing field was fair. Suck it, ya whiney bitches.
Thanks, and goodnight.
So what does the Kerry administration do? They send out a list of Sen. Miller's quotes from the past that have supported/complimented Kerry. Now, pardon me, but people and the policies they back chance, especially in Politics. So really, you can't bring past compliments into the present picture, it just doesn't work. Am I the only one who sees this?
Next... Richard Clarke... This guy is a moron. Right now he's saying that Bush was not concerned about Al-Qaida when he took office. He's saying that Bush was obsessed with Saddam and wasn't paying attention to Clarke's warning that something needed to be done or there could be a serious terrorist threat to the US. Of course, back when Bush was supposed to be doing all of this, Clarke was writing emails and Memo's expressing his satisfaction and approval of the "increased pressure" Bush had put on Al-Qaeda.
Err, hold up, contradiction? Yeah, that's for sure... Sounds like someone wants to sell more copies of his books that's due out for sale... Nah, someone doing something to ensure that more copies of their books sell!? You're kidding me, in DC!?!? No way! Heh, sickening... Anyway, on to the subject line!
Ok, now i'm not sure which one of them it was because I only saw it for half of a second and he had his head down, but i'm pretty sure it was Dr. Dean, in fact i'm almost positive of it. However, it may have been General Clark. Anyway... Today I saw on Fox about how ... Shit, I don't want to talk about this. On to my next rambling.
Linux... Linux is cool, it's open source, yeah yeah, I like it, it's neat. I also like Windows. As much shit as Windows catches is no more then any other major program would catch if it was as scrutinized. Here's a hint: If you don't properly protect your computer, hackers can get into it, it doesn't matter if it's running Windows or Linux or OSX or anything... If you don't take the proper precautions, they'll get into it. Anyhow, that's not even my point! Man, I must be boring you, heh. On to my point...
There was this guy on Fox, I don't know his name and I don't care, he was some old Linux Redhat guy. He was talking about how he wanted the playing field to be fair for all the other corporations against Microsoft. Well, i'm sorry, but that's bullshit. If you want to beat someone in business, you don't cry. You don't cry like a little baby and say that "you just want it to be fair." Well here's some news for you, LIFE IS NOT FAIR, FUCKWADS. Stop crying.
I'm sick of this in general, but in business too. If you want to out sell, then learn how to market a good product. They're whining, blah blah blah. "Microsoft owns/owned 96% of the market..." Yeah, and they worked to get there, they didn't just "get it" because the playing field was fair. Suck it, ya whiney bitches.
Thanks, and goodnight.
Senator Kerry.
Read this article.
Ok, so Senator Kerry wants an "Ask-and-Tell" Military. Eh! Not gonna work. Can't have open gays in the Military. Won't work, sorry. It's not going to work, not because they're gay, personally I couldn't give two shits if someone is gay or straight or bi or whatever they want to call themselves. However, there are too many people in the military who DO care if people are gay and who won't take orders from gay people for no reason other than the fact that they're gay.
It sounds stupid, and I think it is. If we lived in a world where people could be openly gay and not have to worry about people making fun of them or whatever, that'd be great. But in the Military we still have to deal with RACIST people. I mean give me a break. Racism in 2004? Shit, there's no reason to be racist still, but people are still making comments. I hear this and I've only been in the Military for a year. I mean, shit.
People can't even deal with Racism in the Military, something that as a whole, our country has had to deal with since it's birth... Now Kerry wants to have open gays in senior positions? NOT GONNA WORK MR. SENATOR. Like I said before, I don't give a damn if people senior to me or gay. They're senior to me for a reason, because they've been promoted and generally deserve to be there. I'm not the only one in the Military, though, and my view is far from the norm. Especially with young guys in the Military, for some reason a lot of young people in general have the view of "Gay people are inferior,"... And that's why they're young, I guess, because they're stupid... But oh well.
Ask-and-Tell - Stupid Idea... Oh, and having the view he has on terrorism... The view that's basically the same thing Spain's soon to be in power Government is saying, "Attacking terrorism will just cause more terrorism, so leave it alone." Wrong, sorry, wrong again. Have a nice day, Senator Kerry.
Ok, so Senator Kerry wants an "Ask-and-Tell" Military. Eh! Not gonna work. Can't have open gays in the Military. Won't work, sorry. It's not going to work, not because they're gay, personally I couldn't give two shits if someone is gay or straight or bi or whatever they want to call themselves. However, there are too many people in the military who DO care if people are gay and who won't take orders from gay people for no reason other than the fact that they're gay.
It sounds stupid, and I think it is. If we lived in a world where people could be openly gay and not have to worry about people making fun of them or whatever, that'd be great. But in the Military we still have to deal with RACIST people. I mean give me a break. Racism in 2004? Shit, there's no reason to be racist still, but people are still making comments. I hear this and I've only been in the Military for a year. I mean, shit.
People can't even deal with Racism in the Military, something that as a whole, our country has had to deal with since it's birth... Now Kerry wants to have open gays in senior positions? NOT GONNA WORK MR. SENATOR. Like I said before, I don't give a damn if people senior to me or gay. They're senior to me for a reason, because they've been promoted and generally deserve to be there. I'm not the only one in the Military, though, and my view is far from the norm. Especially with young guys in the Military, for some reason a lot of young people in general have the view of "Gay people are inferior,"... And that's why they're young, I guess, because they're stupid... But oh well.
Ask-and-Tell - Stupid Idea... Oh, and having the view he has on terrorism... The view that's basically the same thing Spain's soon to be in power Government is saying, "Attacking terrorism will just cause more terrorism, so leave it alone." Wrong, sorry, wrong again. Have a nice day, Senator Kerry.
St. Patty’s Day Conflict.
Quick Edit: Go here and watch the "My Band" video by D12... It's hilarious. LOL
Here ya go, here's something exciting to read... I read this on a message board, from a credible person. =D Talking about Kerry (refer to my update dated 15 March if you don't know what this is referring to).
He did say World Leaders. He also said "they looked me in the eye" - this, per context, would suggest that he met with them face to face.
Travel records for the Senate show no official trips by Kerry abroad since mid-1992. All visits by foreign leaders compared with Kerry's schedule show him at home, out campaigning, in the hospital, and elsewhere - nowhere near any visiting foreign leaders. His remarks to a questioner in Bethlehem, PA are now under scrutiny. When asked which world leaders, Kerry replied, "That's none of your business, it's mine." Then proceeded to verbally attack the person that asked the question.
Now, first off, what business does a senator have with a foreign leader? That's the job of the President. So he's basically admitted to undermining the authority of the Office of the President of the United States. Furthermore, if he's lying, why aren't Democrats asking more questions? Also, since his travel records have been examined, if he did meet with world leaders, it would have been before Iraq#2 - and if those things were discussed by Kerry and world leaders back then, while the US was gearing up and eventually DID declare war - well, that's sedition. Even if you disagree with policy, one does not have the right to break the law, let alone commit sedition - which can be followed up closely with a charge of treason. This is why some dumb bitch is going to hang for helping Saddam's Iraq and taking payment.
Maybe it's just me, but I have a problem with someone that operates outside the jurisdiction of their office and undermines the rest of the government. Yes, Bush, too at times.
Last note. Due to Kerry's remarks, and his stonewalling of answering questions - after all, NO aspect of official talks on or off the books is private concerning the Presidency, it is the public's right to know - it appears that numerous citizens are writing (both repubs and dems) the Senate Ethics Committee to make a formal inquiry into Kerry's "talks." Hell, John Edwards may become the frontrunner, after all!
Here ya go, here's something exciting to read... I read this on a message board, from a credible person. =D Talking about Kerry (refer to my update dated 15 March if you don't know what this is referring to).
He did say World Leaders. He also said "they looked me in the eye" - this, per context, would suggest that he met with them face to face.
Travel records for the Senate show no official trips by Kerry abroad since mid-1992. All visits by foreign leaders compared with Kerry's schedule show him at home, out campaigning, in the hospital, and elsewhere - nowhere near any visiting foreign leaders. His remarks to a questioner in Bethlehem, PA are now under scrutiny. When asked which world leaders, Kerry replied, "That's none of your business, it's mine." Then proceeded to verbally attack the person that asked the question.
Now, first off, what business does a senator have with a foreign leader? That's the job of the President. So he's basically admitted to undermining the authority of the Office of the President of the United States. Furthermore, if he's lying, why aren't Democrats asking more questions? Also, since his travel records have been examined, if he did meet with world leaders, it would have been before Iraq#2 - and if those things were discussed by Kerry and world leaders back then, while the US was gearing up and eventually DID declare war - well, that's sedition. Even if you disagree with policy, one does not have the right to break the law, let alone commit sedition - which can be followed up closely with a charge of treason. This is why some dumb bitch is going to hang for helping Saddam's Iraq and taking payment.
Maybe it's just me, but I have a problem with someone that operates outside the jurisdiction of their office and undermines the rest of the government. Yes, Bush, too at times.
Last note. Due to Kerry's remarks, and his stonewalling of answering questions - after all, NO aspect of official talks on or off the books is private concerning the Presidency, it is the public's right to know - it appears that numerous citizens are writing (both repubs and dems) the Senate Ethics Committee to make a formal inquiry into Kerry's "talks." Hell, John Edwards may become the frontrunner, after all!
St. Patty’s Day.
I don't know if you read or not, Chris, but if you do, Happy Birthday. If you don't, well then you don't deserve to hear it. =D Hah!... Just kidding, anyway, happy birthday.
I'll try to find something controversial to post later, since it's Chris' birthday and basically Chris reminds me of controversy/confrontation. So i'll find something fitting. =D
I'll try to find something controversial to post later, since it's Chris' birthday and basically Chris reminds me of controversy/confrontation. So i'll find something fitting. =D
Wassup my G’z and Bitches?
...
No? No, I didn't think so either. But apparently that's how I should be talking, since I've spent so much time online. Apparently, here at the BBC, they report that "Schools must do more to help the young speak the language of the workplace, says the Confederation of British Industry."... Gimme a break, what kind of BS is this?
They're reporting that because teenagers spend so much time using "street and mobile slang that they are becoming unemployable..." So don't hire them. Then the parents can kick them out of the house when they hit 18, and I bet they learn to speak properly very quickly. It's funny how quickly people can learn when they need to.
My beef (OMG LOOK SLANG (OMGOMGOMG MORE SLANG!)) with this whole thing is why is the Government (Parliament, whatever you want to call them - House of Lords, House of Commons... Yeah, whatever)... Ok, let me just rely on this tidbit of an article. Why is it that the Confederation of British Industry saying that it's the schools that need to change? Dammit, the schools have been doing generally the same thing for years, decades, centuries, and now they need to change because kids are lazy, sloppy and nihilistic? Gimme a damn break.
Despite their snippy snooty attitudes, their Anglican Church and their "Queen's English is the Real English attitudes," I admire then for how eloquently they speak. Compared to the average American adult the average British Adult speaks wonderfully. So why change the school system? Why change what, how, and for how long the Schools teach? Because the children are little bastards? No, because their Parents don't give a shit. If their parents made them take time on their English homework, on their essays, and all that other good stuff that makes them use the ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND NOT H4x0R 1337 5p33|< then the children wouldn't have a problem in the world (except for the 3 cartons of cigarettes a day those damn British people smoke).
Again, this is another case of "The Parents aren't parenting, so let's blame the."
Ah, what a load of crap. At least it's not just America and it's England, too. =D By the way, my test score, for that link I posted above, is here. I got 5 out of 10.
No? No, I didn't think so either. But apparently that's how I should be talking, since I've spent so much time online. Apparently, here at the BBC, they report that "Schools must do more to help the young speak the language of the workplace, says the Confederation of British Industry."... Gimme a break, what kind of BS is this?
They're reporting that because teenagers spend so much time using "street and mobile slang that they are becoming unemployable..." So don't hire them. Then the parents can kick them out of the house when they hit 18, and I bet they learn to speak properly very quickly. It's funny how quickly people can learn when they need to.
My beef (OMG LOOK SLANG (OMGOMGOMG MORE SLANG!)) with this whole thing is why is the Government (Parliament, whatever you want to call them - House of Lords, House of Commons... Yeah, whatever)... Ok, let me just rely on this tidbit of an article. Why is it that the Confederation of British Industry saying that it's the schools that need to change? Dammit, the schools have been doing generally the same thing for years, decades, centuries, and now they need to change because kids are lazy, sloppy and nihilistic? Gimme a damn break.
Despite their snippy snooty attitudes, their Anglican Church and their "Queen's English is the Real English attitudes," I admire then for how eloquently they speak. Compared to the average American adult the average British Adult speaks wonderfully. So why change the school system? Why change what, how, and for how long the Schools teach? Because the children are little bastards? No, because their Parents don't give a shit. If their parents made them take time on their English homework, on their essays, and all that other good stuff that makes them use the ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND NOT H4x0R 1337 5p33|< then the children wouldn't have a problem in the world (except for the 3 cartons of cigarettes a day those damn British people smoke).
Again, this is another case of "The Parents aren't parenting, so let's blame the
Ah, what a load of crap. At least it's not just America and it's England, too. =D By the way, my test score, for that link I posted above, is here. I got 5 out of 10.
GROWN WOMEN, pathetic.
EDIT: I added something to the bottom. It was another article I came across that I just had to add... It was bothering me.
Ok, before I get into a bad mood about this article... I made some updates. My computer profile is updated to reflect my new computer, also, a comments link has been added to the bottom of each post. Thanks to Rachel, we now have a comments thing. Yay us. =D
Also, no, i'm not Anti-American. =D I'm in the Military for goodness sakes. Just frustrated at times, but it's all good. =D
Here's this article... This really is sad. I'm going to post it because I think my China V. America link is down and this article is from the same site. I'll include the link, also.
Ok, now i'm sorry... I'll be the first one to admit that if Rachel and I ever have a Daughter I will be extremely protective of her. 'Cause that's just me. I won't ever want her to get hurt, be it physical or emotional, although I know it will happen. It's part of life. Kids will be kids.
Those women, not so much the girls, but the WOMEN involved, that's just pathetic. The girl is 12! She's not even a damn teenager yet, and they joined in and beat on the girl, and for what? Because the 14 year olds boyfriend kissed her? I mean, DAMN. She's 12! The boy is 14! They're not even old enough to seriously contemplate a real relationship yet and what one entails! Gimme a damn break, these WOMEN don't know that?
I, in all sincerity, hope that this girl does not die or suffer any serious damage, be it long term or permanent. If she does, though, I hope these WOMEN go to jail for a long time. Honestly, I don't blame the 14 year old that much. Granted, it was her actions, and as much as I preach about taking responsibility for your own actions you might think that I want her to get the brunt of the punishment. I don't, though. She's 14, she was probably hurt (or whatever you call it at that age =D), and her Mother (THE GROWN WOMAN) said something like, "Go beat her ass, sugarlips!" So the Daughter thought that was a good idea, Mom is condoning it, she's a GROWN WOMAN!
What I don't get, I mean, I don't really understand the whole thing, but what I really don't get is this line, "other children and adults joined in." Woah, come on now. I can maybe see other girls, ya know, the girls friends... But ADULTS!? What the fuck is wrong with that picture? ADULTS are beating up a 12 year old girl because the 14 year olds boyfriend kissed her. HE KISSED HER. HE KISSED HER. So we've got two messed up things here. ADULTS are beating up a 12 year old and the 12 year old is getting beat up for something that wasn't her fault.
This kind of shit just sickens me, and honestly, if that girl dies, those adults should all get the death penalty. Period.
EDIT: Here's what I added...
Here is the article. This really bothered me, also... Heh.
Honestly, I agree with everything that was done except the suspending of the student who wrote the article. I disagree with it because he was encouraged by a Professor of Journalism to do it. I completely disagree with the Professor having anything to do with getting the grades. However, I don't believe in censorship. If the Student Body President didn't want his grades to be known to anyone, he shouldn't have told anyone. If he didn't tell anyone and the grades were discovered illegal (by the Professor or anyone else), then that's just wrong.
However, I still don't agree with the suspendsion of the author of the article. He was just doing what he obviously enjoys, reporting.
Have a nice night.
Ok, before I get into a bad mood about this article... I made some updates. My computer profile is updated to reflect my new computer, also, a comments link has been added to the bottom of each post. Thanks to Rachel, we now have a comments thing. Yay us. =D
Also, no, i'm not Anti-American. =D I'm in the Military for goodness sakes. Just frustrated at times, but it's all good. =D
Here's this article... This really is sad. I'm going to post it because I think my China V. America link is down and this article is from the same site. I'll include the link, also.
Baltimore Girl Severely Beaten After Kiss at Party
Baltimore (AP) - Baltimore police say three women and two girls have been arrested in an attack that has left a 12 year old Baltimore girl in a coma.
Detective Donny Moses says it happened during a party, February 28th, in the 500 block of North Louden Avenue.
According to police, it started when a 12 year old boy at the party was dared to kiss Nichole Townes. When he did, the boy's 14 year old girlfriend began attacking Nichole. Police believe the older girl was encouraged by her mother.
Moses says the attack escalated - other children and adults joined in - and Nichole was beaten for at least thirty minutes. She was taken to Hopkins Pediatric Center, where she remains in a coma.
Police say three adult women and two teenage girls are accused of beating the girl and have been charged. Thirty-six year old Monique Baldwin, the owner of the home where the attack took place, has been charged with attempted first-degree murder, along with 19 year old Erin Baldwin.
Ok, now i'm sorry... I'll be the first one to admit that if Rachel and I ever have a Daughter I will be extremely protective of her. 'Cause that's just me. I won't ever want her to get hurt, be it physical or emotional, although I know it will happen. It's part of life. Kids will be kids.
Those women, not so much the girls, but the WOMEN involved, that's just pathetic. The girl is 12! She's not even a damn teenager yet, and they joined in and beat on the girl, and for what? Because the 14 year olds boyfriend kissed her? I mean, DAMN. She's 12! The boy is 14! They're not even old enough to seriously contemplate a real relationship yet and what one entails! Gimme a damn break, these WOMEN don't know that?
I, in all sincerity, hope that this girl does not die or suffer any serious damage, be it long term or permanent. If she does, though, I hope these WOMEN go to jail for a long time. Honestly, I don't blame the 14 year old that much. Granted, it was her actions, and as much as I preach about taking responsibility for your own actions you might think that I want her to get the brunt of the punishment. I don't, though. She's 14, she was probably hurt (or whatever you call it at that age =D), and her Mother (THE GROWN WOMAN) said something like, "Go beat her ass, sugarlips!" So the Daughter thought that was a good idea, Mom is condoning it, she's a GROWN WOMAN!
What I don't get, I mean, I don't really understand the whole thing, but what I really don't get is this line, "other children and adults joined in." Woah, come on now. I can maybe see other girls, ya know, the girls friends... But ADULTS!? What the fuck is wrong with that picture? ADULTS are beating up a 12 year old girl because the 14 year olds boyfriend kissed her. HE KISSED HER. HE KISSED HER. So we've got two messed up things here. ADULTS are beating up a 12 year old and the 12 year old is getting beat up for something that wasn't her fault.
This kind of shit just sickens me, and honestly, if that girl dies, those adults should all get the death penalty. Period.
EDIT: Here's what I added...
Here is the article. This really bothered me, also... Heh.
Honestly, I agree with everything that was done except the suspending of the student who wrote the article. I disagree with it because he was encouraged by a Professor of Journalism to do it. I completely disagree with the Professor having anything to do with getting the grades. However, I don't believe in censorship. If the Student Body President didn't want his grades to be known to anyone, he shouldn't have told anyone. If he didn't tell anyone and the grades were discovered illegal (by the Professor or anyone else), then that's just wrong.
However, I still don't agree with the suspendsion of the author of the article. He was just doing what he obviously enjoys, reporting.
Have a nice night.
